Logo

Judge Halts Deportations to South Sudan After Supreme Court Approval

One day after the Supreme Court authorized deportations to South Sudan, a federal judge paused the removals to hear new claims highlighting due process. Despite ongoing civil war in South Sudan, the Trump administration aimed to deport non-South Sudanese immigrants, prompting legal challenges and emergency hearings about the legality and ethics of the transfers.

Judge Halts Deportations to South Sudan After Supreme Court Approval

Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Deportations to South Sudan

Just one day after the Supreme Court approved the deportation of eight immigrants to South Sudan, a federal judge stepped in to temporarily halt their removal. The immigrants, originally from Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam, and other nations, faced deportation amid the ongoing conflict in South Sudan—a country currently engulfed in civil war and strongly advised against for travel by the US government.

Unfolding Legal Backdrop

The case took an unexpected turn when District Judge Randolph Moss held an emergency hearing on the Fourth of July. He requested the Trump administration discuss whether the longstanding wartime law invoked for the deportation triggers due process rights—rights that might extend to those facing expulsion to South Sudan.

This ruling came after the government had flown the immigrants to Djibouti but was blocked from moving them further following a Massachusetts court decision. That court had previously ruled immigrants could not be transferred to a new country without a chance for a hearing.

Supreme Court's Role and Subsequent Legal Moves

Last month, the Supreme Court vacated that Massachusetts ruling, and on Thursday night, it issued a clarification ordering that the immigrants could indeed be sent to South Sudan. However, the immigrants' lawyers swiftly filed an emergency request to halt the removals, prompting Judge Moss to grant a temporary stay and allow time for a formal hearing.

This new hearing is intended to explore whether the due process protections, previously linked to an 18th-century wartime immigration law cited by the President, apply to the deportations to South Sudan. Judge Moss's decision, initially reported by legal experts, signals the court's recognition of the complex humanitarian and legal issues at play.

Implications Amid Conflict

The US government has been pursuing deportations under challenging circumstances, given South Sudan's volatile situation. While these immigrants are not South Sudanese, the prospect of sending them to a conflict zone raised serious legal and ethical concerns. President Donald Trump's administration continues to push for these removals, framed within its broader immigration enforcement agenda.

What’s Next?

With the hearing underway, the government must respond to the judge’s queries, weighing the balance between immigration policies and due process rights. The temporary halt grants critical time for the courts to scrutinize the legality of forcibly relocating immigrants to one of the world’s most dangerous regions.

Key Takeaway: The unfolding legal saga underscores the tension between government immigration enforcement and the protection of human rights, especially when deportations involve conflict zones like South Sudan.

US Judge Rules Trump Administration Illegally Ended Humanitarian Parole Program
US Judge Rules Trump Administration Illegally Ended Humanitarian Parole Program

A federal judge determined that the Trump administration improperly suspended the humanitarian parole program, which allowed nearly 900,000 migrants from conflict-affected countries to reside temporarily in the US. The decision challenges former administration policies that halted renewals of these permits, affecting diverse migrant communities and highlighting legal opposition to mass deportation strategies.

Harvard Receives 30-Day Pause in Trump Administration Foreign Student Dispute
Harvard Receives 30-Day Pause in Trump Administration Foreign Student Dispute

Harvard University has won a 30-day extension blocking the Trump administration's efforts to revoke its certification for enrolling international students, which affects about a quarter of its student body. The university argues the administration's actions violate federal regulations and constitutional rights, while facing accusations of fostering campus issues and foreign influence. A federal judge will soon decide whether to prolong this temporary order.

US Judge Extends Order Blocking Trump Ban on Harvard Foreign Students
US Judge Extends Order Blocking Trump Ban on Harvard Foreign Students

US District Judge Allison Burroughs extended an order blocking the Trump administration's efforts to prevent Harvard University from enrolling foreign students. The case follows Harvard’s lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for procedural lapses and concerns about an atmosphere of fear among students amid allegations involving campus antisemitism and foreign coordination. The decision highlights ongoing disputes over immigration policies and university governance.

US Judge Extends Order Blocking Trump Ban on Foreign Students at Harvard
US Judge Extends Order Blocking Trump Ban on Foreign Students at Harvard

A US District Judge has extended an order blocking the Trump administration's attempt to prevent Harvard University from enrolling foreign students. The university filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security citing procedural violations and an unsettling climate for students. Harvard continues to resist political demands from the administration seeking governance reforms.

US Supreme Court Allows Revocation of Parole Status for Migrants
US Supreme Court Allows Revocation of Parole Status for Migrants

The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to rescind temporary parole status granted to more than 500,000 migrants from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua. This move supports expedited deportations and stays a federal judge's block on revoking parole while related lawsuits continue. The parole policy, initially expanded under President Biden, provided temporary legal status for humanitarian reasons. Legal challenges assert the revocation violates federal law by discontinuing parole en masse rather than case-by-case, with opponents warning of severe risks for affected migrants.

US Supreme Court Allows End to Parole Status for 500,000 Migrants
US Supreme Court Allows End to Parole Status for 500,000 Migrants

The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary immigration parole for about 532,000 migrants from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua. This lifts a lower court's block on ending the program created by the Biden administration, potentially exposing many to fast-tracked deportation as legal battles continue. The decision, opposed by two liberal justices, emphasizes increased efforts to curb illegal immigration.

US Supreme Court Allows Trump to Revoke Legal Status of 500,000 Immigrants
US Supreme Court Allows Trump to Revoke Legal Status of 500,000 Immigrants

The US Supreme Court approved the Trump administration's move to rescind the legal status of over half a million migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, ending protections afforded under a humanitarian parole program. This ruling permits the administration to begin revocations and possible deportations amid ongoing legal disputes, drawing criticism over the potential humanitarian impact on affected individuals and their families.

Investigators Question Trump Threat Letter Allegedly Sent by Immigrant Ramon Morales Reyes
Investigators Question Trump Threat Letter Allegedly Sent by Immigrant Ramon Morales Reyes

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced the arrest of Ramon Morales Reyes for allegedly sending a threatening letter against former President Trump. However, recent investigations reveal handwriting inconsistencies and suggest Morales Reyes, an undocumented immigrant and key witness in an upcoming trial, might have been framed to prevent his testimony. His attorneys dispute the allegations, and the investigation continues.

US Court Temporarily Halts Deportations to South Sudan Over Due Process Concerns
US Court Temporarily Halts Deportations to South Sudan Over Due Process Concerns

A federal judge has paused deportations of eight individuals to South Sudan following new legal arguments about due process rights under an 18th-century wartime statute. The immigrants, from several countries, were first moved to Djibouti but faced a court block on their further removal. This temporary stay follows a recent Supreme Court ruling allowing the deportation, prompting deeper judicial review.

Federal Judge Blocks Government from Detaining Columbia Activist Mahmoud Khalil
Federal Judge Blocks Government from Detaining Columbia Activist Mahmoud Khalil

Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University activist, has won a temporary reprieve from deportation and detention after a federal judge ruled against the government’s claim that he poses a national security threat. The decision challenges the use of a rare legal provision invoked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, allowing time for an appeal.

US Court Blocks Deportation of Columbia Activist Mahmoud Khalil Over Free Speech Concerns
US Court Blocks Deportation of Columbia Activist Mahmoud Khalil Over Free Speech Concerns

A federal judge has halted the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist, who was detained after his green card was revoked. The ruling highlights concerns over free speech violations as the administration sought his deportation under a rare immigration provision citing adverse US foreign policy interests.

Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Fast-Track Deportations to Third Countries
Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Fast-Track Deportations to Third Countries

The Supreme Court has enabled the return of rapid deportations to third countries without prior notice, overturning a federal injunction. The move, supported by the majority, was opposed by the liberal justices citing serious risks of torture and unsafe conditions for deportees. The decision remains effective pending ongoing appeals.

US Supreme Court Clears Path for Trump’s Third-Country Deportations
US Supreme Court Clears Path for Trump’s Third-Country Deportations

The US Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to restart third-country deportations, enabling the removal of undocumented migrants to countries other than their own. This follows a lower court’s halt citing lack of due process, but conservatives reversed the stay, sparking sharp dissent over migrant rights and safety.

Supreme Court Clears Path for Third-Country Deportations in Trump Era
Supreme Court Clears Path for Third-Country Deportations in Trump Era

In a pivotal ruling, the Supreme Court cleared the way for the federal government to continue deporting undocumented migrants to third countries. This decision supports President Trump's stringent immigration measures, overturning a lower court's block on such removals. Despite dissent from three liberal justices, the administration can now resume deportations while the legal challenge proceeds in appeals court.

Bangladesh Supreme Court Restores Jamaat-e-Islami Party Registration
Bangladesh Supreme Court Restores Jamaat-e-Islami Party Registration

The Supreme Court of Bangladesh has restored the registration of Jamaat-e-Islami, the country's largest Islamist party, reversing a ban that lasted more than ten years. This decision permits the party to engage in elections and marks a significant development in Bangladesh's political arena. The ruling follows a recent court overturning of a conviction against a key Jamaat leader connected to the 1971 independence war, highlighting ongoing judicial reassessments of politically charged cases. The reinstatement is expected to promote a more inclusive political system amid the nation's complex historical and political context.

Inmate Forged Threatening Letters to Deport Key Witness in Trump Case
Inmate Forged Threatening Letters to Deport Key Witness in Trump Case

Demetric DeShawn Scott, an inmate in Wisconsin, fabricated threatening letters aimed at former President Donald Trump to implicate an undocumented immigrant witness, Ramon Morales-Reyes. Scott’s plan was to get Morales-Reyes deported ahead of his trial to force a dismissal. Morales-Reyes remains detained due to his immigration status and awaits a court hearing. Scott faces multiple felony charges for this scheme.

Macron Announces Historic Airbus-Malaysia Airlines Partnership Boosting Franco-Asian Trade
Macron Announces Historic Airbus-Malaysia Airlines Partnership Boosting Franco-Asian Trade

French President Emmanuel Macron revealed a landmark partnership between Airbus and Malaysia Airlines during Malaysian PM Anwar Ibrahim's visit. The deal includes an order for A330neo jets and extends into key sectors like rare earths and energy. This move highlights strengthened Franco-Asian trade relations as Europe braces for possible US tariffs.

UK Court Upholds Ban on Palestine Action Over RAF Base Protest
UK Court Upholds Ban on Palestine Action Over RAF Base Protest

The UK government’s decision to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist group stands after the High Court denied a temporary pause. The pro-Palestinian group’s direct action protests, including damaging planes at a Royal Air Force base, prompted the designation amid claims of British support for Israel. The group plans an urgent appeal against the ban.