Federal Court Orders Return of National Guard Control to California
In a striking legal decision, a federal judge has ruled that former President Donald Trump unlawfully deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles amid protests over immigration raids. The order requires the immediate return of control over the Guard troops to California authorities.
Legal Breach of the Tenth Amendment
The ruling, set to take effect at noon on Friday, emphasized that the deployment violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded the scope of Trump's legal authority. US District Judge Charles Breyer made clear that the President’s move overstepped constitutional boundaries, highlighting the limits placed on federal power.
Background: Deployment Amid Rising Tensions
Approximately 4,000 National Guard members were dispatched to Los Angeles following protests sparked by aggressive immigration crackdowns. Governor Gavin Newsom challenged the deployment, arguing that the National Guard’s use in immigration enforcement was both unauthorized and likely to inflame civil unrest.
California’s legal action included an emergency motion seeking to prevent the Guard from assisting immigration agents, citing concerns that their involvement would exacerbate tensions on the ground.
Operational Details and Immediate Impact
Major General Scott Sherman, commander of Task Force 51 overseeing the troops, revealed that around 500 Guard members had been trained to support immigration operations by escorting federal agents. Guard personnel had already been photographed providing security during these raids.
However, Judge Breyer’s ruling challenges the legality of this deployment from the outset, raising immediate questions about the National Guard’s role moving forward.
Judicial Perspective on Constitutional Limits
During pre-ruling remarks, Judge Breyer underscored the constitutional foundation of the case: "This country was founded in response to a monarch, and the Constitution is a document of limitations. I’m trying to figure out where the lines are drawn." His comments reflect a critical examination of executive power and federalism.
Next Steps and Uncertain Ground Realities
The White House has yet to issue a response to the restraining order. Meanwhile, it remains unclear how the transition of Guard control will affect ongoing operations and the broader situation amid heightened tensions over immigration enforcement.
