US Airstrikes on Iranian Nuclear Facilities Spark Stern Warning from Tehran
Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, strongly condemned recent US airstrikes targeting three Iranian nuclear sites, branding them as "criminal behaviour" with potentially "everlasting consequences." This marked Tehran’s first official response following the American military operation that struck key nuclear enrichment facilities.
Accusations of Lawlessness and Grave Threats
In an emphatic statement, Araghchi described the US actions as "outrageous" and expressed deep concern over the implications of such attacks, urging all members of the United Nations to take notice of what he termed an "extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior."
He underscored Iran's right to respond under international law, invoking provisions from the UN Charter that allow for self-defense. "Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people," the minister added, signaling a firm stance against further incursions.
Details of the Strikes and US Response
The strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The US military confirmed the operation, with reports highlighting a "full payload of BOMBS" dropped on the Fordow site. The action was hailed as a significant achievement by US officials, noting that all aircraft safely returned to base.
Despite the attack, statements from US leadership emphasized a broader goal of peace, declaring, "NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!" while congratulating the military personnel involved.
Global Repercussions and Regional Stability Concerns
The swift military action and Iran's vigorous condemnation add to escalating tensions between the two countries, raising concerns about potential instability in the region. Tehran’s warning of "everlasting consequences" suggests a possible widening of conflict if diplomatic channels remain blocked.
As international observers monitor developments closely, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the fragile state of nuclear diplomacy and the risks of military reinforcement in an already volatile context.
